Short Reflections on the Life of Mary, the Mother of our Lord.

P. Ben [April 13, 2015]
_______

It is necessary to bear in mind that the early chapters of the gospel according to Luke, is not merely a factual account of Christ’s birth persuasive to a religious ear. It is all too common for natural instincts to draw pictures of common natural associations between the Child and the mother, but this also means that a man is treading down the long alley of Catholic contraptions.*

*The end of all Catholic means is to reinstate the Jewish camp of religion. The camp got disbanded during the times of pagan Titus only to revive later under the garb of ecclesiastical priesthood centered on Mary and Peter though in an insidious way. Mary being the mother of our Lord was the symbol of the nation of Israel. Peter was the voice of the Galilean remnant. No wonder, it is but a subtle system built on the edifice of Jewish settings. 

Luke 1 presents to us various prophetic announcements but nonetheless we do not find the inquisitive ponderings in the heart of Mary. Ponderings begin in Luke 2.

Luke 1 brings to us the Jewish remnant though not palpable to the world at large but displaying a thankful heart to God for having intervened to make good the promises made to Abraham in connection with the counsels of grace to which the house of David stands out in the most remarkable way. There is no reference to Moses and the law. Refer Luke 1:32, 33, 48-55, 68-75. Millennial joy is anticipated no doubt but strictly within the Jewish confines of thought.  

Luke 2 brings in two new features- the first being, millennial joy anticipated beyond the Jewish hedges (admission of gentiles) while the second being the fall and rising of many in Israel. 

Coming to the first feature, it is revealed by the angelic host particularly in Luke 2:14. It holds connection with Proverbs 8:30 and 31. It conveys to us the counsels of Jehovah, the final realization of which carries us to the millennial earth. But, here it is spoken in terms well beyond the Jewish confines. Simeon speaks of salvation of the gentiles (v 32). Both these incidents produce surprise and wonder- some sort of new revelation from what was revealed earlier (v19 and v33).

Coming to the second feature, Simeon adds the mystical element to the remarkable affair. For Simeon, the sword shall pierce through the soul of Mary (v35). This is spoken in the context of the rejection and death of Christ on the cross. Some fall as a result of the setting aside of the Messiah while others are set to rise (v 34). But this was painful revelation though glorious on other accounts. It was a serious thing to consider, after all prophesied to some extent in Daniel 12:2, 3.

To conclude then, we have ponderings in the heart of the remnant in connection with the admission of the gentiles and secondly, the remnant had to painfully acknowledge the rejection of the Messiah and the consequent fall of many (the apostate nation in judgment).

To pass on, we now come to the temple visit of the Lord. Two things unfold here- firstly, Christ was in relationship with the Father even before the baptismal decent of the Holy Spirit upon Him in Luke 3:21*. Secondly, the remnant lacks the understanding of what Christ was as under the law.

*This is an allusion to the variations of the grain offering. Back in Leviticus 2: 4, we have ‘flour mingled with oil’ and ‘wafers anointed with oil’. The former is Christ’ incarnation while the latter is Jordan’ baptism. In Luke 2, the Person of Christ in relationship with the Father is brought out as independent of all other sources. It is Christ’ Person in whom, alone rests the merit and virtue of this glorious relationship, though Jordan’s baptism entitles Him for a glorious ministry approved of God by miracles and wonders and signs (Acts 2).

Coming to the second feature, the scene presents to us the remnant which hitherto engrossed in covenants of promises pertaining to Abraham and David (Luke 1), suffer the loss of apprehension as to the immediate ministry of Christ under the law. The promises to Abraham and David are apart from the law to which the remnant is well accustomed and engaged. Since, the remnant itself is the fruit of God’s election by grace. But at the same time, the present ministry of Christ was under the law (Galatians 4: 4), not just as perfect Man under the law but as Son under the law, to redeem those that were under the law- but this divine idea was inconceivable then- although Christ subjected Himself unto them but this made Mary to ponder (Luke 2:51). The point to understand is that here the name of the Father is brought out by the Lord- ‘Father’s’ business. But this is unique because Galatians tells us it is impossible to receive the adoption of sons under the law (Gal 4:5) - that is in our case. As under the law, only the curse persisted. But in the case of the Lord- He was Son under the law (though by voluntary subjection)-  but this very fact could not be well appreciated by the remnant. Luke 2 refers to Galatians 4:4- made of a woman (Luke 2:7), made under the law (Luke 2:22- exhibited fully at His circumcision). But it must be remembered that though under the law, He was Son- an exceptional case. The remnant had not fully understood the implications of Christ immediate ministry under the law and yet for the fulfillment of the promises made to Abraham- Refer Romans 15:8.

Contemplative ponderings in Luke 2 were the outcome of the inability to perceive the counsels of God’s grace in its broadest display on the part of the godly Jewish remnant of those times. This was later fully made clear in the epistles to the Romans and the Galatians. The Jewish remnant is referred to as ‘remnant according to the election of grace’ in Romans and the ‘Israel of God’ in Galatians. Simeon’s prophecy in Luke 2 about the blessing to the gentiles and the fall of many in Israel is discussed in Romans 9. But the temple scene of Luke 2 presents to us Galatians 4.

To conclude then we have the remnant pondering over the matters of the admission of gentiles, rejection of the Messiah and the ministry of Christ under the law yet being the same time the sustainer of all the promises by grace.

The temple scene in Luke 2 presents to us the Son under the law, national heads (doctors)* engrossed by the matters of the law to which the answers are given by the Son (v 47)-  the dispenser of grace apart from the law and finally the inability of the remnant to conceive the ministry of Christ under the law (the perplexity of the parents). 

*Luke 2:46-47, ‘Both hearing them, and asking them questions…at His understanding and answers’- Compare this with the Paul’s questions- ‘This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit…and worketh miracles among you doeth he it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?’-Gal 3. The answers of course are implied.

In John 2, Mary is the nation that experiences the natural separation of the Messiah- ‘Woman, what have I to do with thee?’  The blessing of the wine at Cana is not the millennium itself but only a testimony of the coming millennium. The hour was not yet come.

 

Go to Collected-Writings.net